TY - JOUR AU - Bechman, Mette AU - Ekstrøm, Jeanette AU - Remvig, Kirstin PY - 2019/03/28 Y2 - 2024/03/29 TI - Reference Management Tools - Same, Same but Different JF - Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education JA - NORIL VL - 11 IS - 1 SE - Conference proceedings DO - 10.15845/noril.v11i1.2806 UR - https://noril.uib.no/article/view/2806 SP - AB - <p>Reference management is an essential part of academic practice, for staff and students alike, and software&nbsp;to support reference management has grown into a standard, almost universal, service across Higher&nbsp;Education institutions around the world.&nbsp;</p><p>The market is huge and the solutions plentiful. Some are free and others very pricey, some are extremely&nbsp;basic while others offer very advanced features. So how does one decide which software to run&nbsp; with?&nbsp;</p><p>In this workshop, we will explore four popular RM tools that all do the same basic jobs (i.e. store data and&nbsp;support the implementation of reference regimes) but on top of that also offer different and unique&nbsp;features, collaborative, organisational, or compositional.&nbsp;</p><p>The tools in focus are: Citavi, Endnote, Mendeley, &amp; Zotero.</p><p>This workshop is an opportunity for everybody interested in software-based reference management,&nbsp;seasoned users as well as curious newcomers, to explore as a group and discuss selected&nbsp; solutions, to share&nbsp;best-practice experiences, and, hopefully, to understand more clearly what is gained and&nbsp; what is missed&nbsp;when institutions opt for one universal software solution at the expense of others.&nbsp;</p> ER -