Evaluering av et pedagogisk undervisningsopplegg i akademisk skriving

Authors

  • Anne-Lise Eng Høgskolen i Østfold
  • Stine Torp Løkkeberg
  • Lars Rune Halvorsen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15845/noril.v14i1.4227

Keywords:

academic writing, first-year students, pre- and post-tests, blended learning, e-learning, traditional learning, akademisk skriving, førsteårsstudenter, pre- og posttester, blandet undervisning, e-læring, tradisjonell undervisning

Abstract

At Østfold University College, we have focused on interdisciplinary collaboration to provide a comprehensive introduction to academic writing for first-year students, emphasizing a standardized program to ensure consistency in instruction. The article is divided into two studies. Both studies aimed to improve first-year students' academic writing skills by evaluating different instructional methods. The research questions for the studies were as follows:

Study 1: Can the use of pre- and post-tests in an e-learning course in academic writing help students acquire new knowledge? 
Study 2: How do students experience blended teaching in academic writing?

Study 1 examined whether pre- and post-tests in an e-learning course could help students acquire new knowledge in academic writing. An e-learning package was developed around eight themes: problem statement, text writing, sources, source criticism, study techniques, referencing techniques, plagiarism, and ethics. Forty-four first-year students took a pre-test of fifteen questions and received immediate feedback. After completing the instructional components for each theme, they took a post-test. Results showed significant improvement in post-tests, indicating increased understanding of the themes.

Study 2 aimed to establish a quality-assured course package combining e-learning with on-campus instruction. A Facebook group was also created for students to ask questions about academic writing. Fifty-eight first-year students completed a questionnaire containing twelve different questions related to the evaluation of the various teaching methods in the blended instruction. In study 2, the evaluation of the academic writing course revealed that all three teaching methods were perceived as important for learning.

References

Almlie, G. S. (2020). Akademisk fagskriving på ingeniørstudiet. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 12(2), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.15845/noril.v12i2.3038

Bair, M. A. & Mader, C. E. (2013). Academic writing at the graduate level: Improving the curriculum through faculty collaboration. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 10(1), Artikkel 4. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.10.1.4

Bern, L. T., Özkal Lorentzen, N. & Nordanger, M. (2021). Fortellinger om tid og synlighet: En studie av studenters deltakelse i digital undervisning under covid-19-pandemien. Uniped, 44(4), 248–261. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1893-8981-2021-04-04

Bernstein, M., Roney, L., Kazer, M. & Boquet, E. H. (2020). Librarians collaborate successfully with nursing faculty and a writing centre to support nursing students doing professional doctorates. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 37(3), 240–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12327

Bliuc, A.-M., Goodyear, P. & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students’ experiences of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.001

Brown, C. A., Dickson, R., Humphreys, A.-L., McQuillan, V. & Smears, E. (2008). Promoting academic writing/referencing skills: Outcome of an undergraduate e-learning pilot project. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00735.x

Chen, W. & Yao, A. (2016). An empirical evaluation of critical factors influencing learner satisfaction in blended learning: A pilot study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4, 1667–1671. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040719

Chugh, R. & Ruhi, U. (2018). Social media in higher education: A literature review of Facebook. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9621-2

Cook, B. R. & Babon, A. (2017). Active learning through online quizzes: better learning and less (busy) work. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 41(1), 24-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1185772

Dalland, O. (2010). Pedagogiske utfordringer for helse- og sosialarbeidere (2. utg.). Gyldendal akademisk.

Dysthe, O., Hoel, T. L. & Hertzberg, F. (2010). Skrive for å lære: Skriving i høyere utdanning (2. utg.). Abstrakt.

Eik-Nes, N. L. (2024, 1. februar). Vi har ansvaret for å lære studentene å skrive og lese akademisk. Khrono. https://www.khrono.no/vi-har-ansvaret-for-a-laere-studentene-a-skrive-og-lese-akademisk/845890

Elliott, S., Hendry, H., Ayres, C., Blackman, K., Browning, F., Colebrook, D., Cook, C., Coy, N., Hughes, J., Lilley, N., Newboult, D., Uche, O., Rickell, A., Rura, G.-P., Wilson, H. & White, P. (2019). «On the outside I’m smiling but inside I’m crying»: Communication successes and challenges for undergraduate academic writing. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(9), 1163–1180. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1455077

El Mansour, B., & Mupinga, D. M. (2007). Students’ positive and negative experiences in hybrid and online classes. College Student Journal, 41(1), 242–248.

Eng, A.-L. (2015). E-læring og studenter: Studenters beskrivelser av og refleksjoner over et e-læringskurs i akademisk skriving [Masteroppgave]. Høgskolen i Lillehammer. https://brage.inn.no/inn-xmlui/handle/11250/283654

Gherheș, V., Stoian, C. E., Fărcașiu, M. A., & Stanici, M. (2021). E-learning vs. Face-to-face learning: Analyzing students’ preferences and behaviors. Sustainability, 13(8), 4381. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084381

Gjerdrum, E., Fossland, T. M. & Ramberg, K. R. (2013). Ulike forståelser av kvalitet i norsk, fleksibel høyere utdanning: Teknologi og læring på og utenfor campus. Norgesuniversitetet.

Güzer, B. & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present and future of blended learning: An in depth analysis of literature. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4596–4603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.992

Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., Drysdale, J. S. & Henrie, C. R. (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004

Hermita, N., Alim, J. A., Putra, Z. H., Mahartika, I. & Sulistiyo, U. (2024). Hybrid learning, blended learning or face-to-face learning: which one is more effective in remediating misconception? Quality Assurance in Education, 32(1), 64-78. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2023-0019

Hambro, C. D., Skillingstad, T. L. & Strøm, J. T. (2019). Akademiske skrivesentres rolle i høyere utdanning. Uniped, 42(3), 290–307. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1893-8981-2019-03-05

Lind, T. & Stålberg, A. (2023). Professional collaboration in higher education to support academic writing: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education / Dansk Universitetspaedagogisk Tidsskrift, 18(35), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.7146/dut.v18i35.136184

Luetsch, K. & Burrows, J. (2016). Certainty rating in pre-and post-tests of study modules in an online clinical pharmacy course—A pilot study to evaluate teaching and learning. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), Artikkel 267. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0783-1

Lopez-Perez, M. V., Perez-Lopez, M. C. & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 818–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023

Lødding, B. & Aamodt, P. O. (2015). Studieforberedt etter studieforberedende? Overgangen mellom studieforberedende utdanningsprogram og høyere utdanning belyst gjennom gruppesamtaler med lærere, studenter og elever (Rapport 2015: 28). NIFU. https://nifu.brage.unit.no/nifu-xmlui/handle/11250/2359539

Merkley, C. (2013). The launch of a joint library/writing centre online course on academic integrity. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice, 8(2), 258-260. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8B619

Meyer, M. E. (2014). E-Læring som pedagogisk virkemiddel for innlæring av anatomi, fysiologi og biokjemi i sykepleierutdanningen. Uniped, 37(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.3402/uniped.v37.22706

Min, W. & Yu, Z. (2023). A systematic review of critical success factors in blended learning. Education Sciences, 13(5), Artikkel 469. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050469

Nzekwe-Excel, C. (2014). Academic writing workshops: Impact of attendance on performance. Journal of Academic Writing, 4(1), 12–25.

Niu, Y., Xi, H., Liu, J., Sui, X., Li, F., Xu, H., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Zhang, S. & Guo, L. (2023). Effects of blended learning on undergraduate nursing students’ knowledge, skills, critical thinking ability and mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education in Practice, 72, Artikkel 103786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103786

Norgesuniversitetet. (2015). Digital tilstand 2014 (Norgesuniversitetets skriftserie 1/2015). Direktoratet for høyere utdanning og kompetanse.

Nortvig, A.-M., Petersen, A. K. & Balle, S. H. (2018). A literature review of the factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction and engagement. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 16(1), 46–55. https://academic-publishing.org/index.php/ejel/article/view/1855/1818

NOU 2014: 5. (2014). MOOC til Norge: Nye digitale læringsformer i høyere utdanning. Kunnskapsdepartementet. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/NOU-2014-5/id762916/

Sell, I. S., Alsø, M. & Wilhelmsen, T. (2022). Progresjon og samstemthet i undervisning: Akademisk skriving i barnehagelærerutdanningen. Følgeforskning på Profesjon, Progresjon og Praksis-strukturen (PPP) i barnehagelærerutdanningen ved USN, 2020-2021. Rapport 2. I 87 (Skriftserien fra Universitetet i Sørøst-Norge nr. 82). Universitetet i Sørøst-Norge. https://openarchive.usn.no/usn-xmlui/handle/11250/2836369

Spanjers, I. A. E., Könings, K. D., Leppink, J., Verstegen, D. M. L., de Jong, N., Czabanowska, K. & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2015). The promised land of blended learning: Quizzes as a moderator. Educational Research Review, 15, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.05.001

St.meld. nr. 27 (2000-2001). Gjør din plikt—krev din rett: Kvalitetsreform av høyere utdanning. Kirke-utdannings- og forskningsdepartementet.

https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/stmeld-nr-27-2000-2001-/id194247/

St.meld. nr. 16 (2006-2007). ... Og ingen sto igjen: Tidlig innsats for livslang læring. Kunnskapsdepartementet. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/stmeld-nr-16-2006-2007-/id441395/

Sun, S. Y. H. (2014). Learner perspectives on fully online language learning. Distance Education, 35(1), 18–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.891428

Swaminathan, N., Ravichandran, L., Ramachandran, S. & Milanese, S. (2020). Blended learning and health professional education: Protocol for a mixed-method systematic review. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 9(1), 9–46. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_489_19

Tse, M. M. Y. & Lo, L. W. L. (2008). A web-based e-learning course: integration of pathophysiology into pharmacology. Telemedicine and e-Health, 14(9), 919–924. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2008.0006

Universitets- og høgskolerådet. (2015). Bibliotek i universitets- og høgskolesektoren—Utvikling, roller og oppgaver 1. November 2015. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=Bibliotek+i+universitets-+og+h%C3%B8gskolesektoren+-+utvikling%2C+roller+og+oppgaver+1.+november+2015

Vo, H. M., Zhu, C. & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002

Zanin-Yost, A. & Dillen, C. (2019). Connecting past to future needs: Nursing faculty and librarian collaboration to support students’ academic success. Journal of Library Administration, 59(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2018.1549407

Downloads

Published

2025-05-20

How to Cite

Eng, A.-L., Løkkeberg, S. T., & Halvorsen , L. R. (2025). Evaluering av et pedagogisk undervisningsopplegg i akademisk skriving. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 14(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.15845/noril.v14i1.4227