Samarbeid med forskere om kunnskapsoppsummeringer

Muligheter og utfordringer

Authors

  • Elin Opheim University of Inland Norway
  • Kjell Erik Johnsen Østfold University of Applied Sciences
  • Gøril Tvedten Jorem Western Norway University of Applied Sciences
  • Didrik Telle-Wernersen University of South-Eastern Norway
  • Kjersti Dahlskås Urnes The Norwegian Police University College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15845/noril.v15i1.4788

Keywords:

systematiske litteratursøk, systematic literature searches, librarian-researcher collaboration, research support services, samarbeid forsker – bibliotekar, bibliotekar, forskningsstøtte, systematiske oversikter, systematiske søk

Abstract

Many academic libraries offer systematic literature search support services, including searches for various types of reviews. When involved in reviews, librarians collaborate closely with individual researchers or research groups and may either supervise or conduct the searches themselves. Such collaboration provides an excellent opportunity to showcase librarians’ methodological and search expertise, but it can also present challenges. The BISON Network Working Group (“Librarians involved in systematic reviews in Norway”) invited participants to discuss this topic at VIRAK 2025. Using the World Café method, 32 participants explored five questions about the opportunities and challenges librarians may encounter in their work with systematic searches: 1) Can you share a positive experience from a previous collaboration with researchers? What were the key success factors in your opinion? 2) What opportunities and challenges do you see in clarifying expectations during a kick-off meeting between librarians and researchers? 3) What do you think researchers find challenging in the collaboration? 4) How can situations perceived as challenging be addressed? 5) What are the advantages and challenges of promoting search services? Participants represented small and large libraries and varying levels of experience with systematic searches. Summaries from the discussions highlighted that a structured approach to clarifying expectations and roles, along with methodological competence, are key factors for effective collaboration. However, issues such as time constraints, understanding of methods, and communicating one’s own expertise were identified as common challenges. Based on the World Café summaries and a later BISON-webinar a set of best-practice recommendations has been developed.

References

Cassidy, A., & Fox, J. (2013). Modified World Café Discussion Model for Conference and Course Settings. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 6, 99–104. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1059092.pdf

Elvekrok, I., & Smith, K. H. (2013). Kafédialog som pedagogisk verktøy. Uniped, 36(2), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.3402/uniped.v36i2.21512

Jensen, M. R., & Solhaug, S. (2020). Systematic searches: A new area of cooperation between the library and the social sciences. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 12(2), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.15845/noril.v12i2.3105

Nicholson, J., McCrillis, A., & Williams, J. D. (2017). Collaboration challenges in systematic reviews: A survey of health sciences librarians. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(4). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.176

O’Dwyer, L. C., & Wafford, Q. E. (2021). Addressing challenges with systematic review teams through effective communication: A case report. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109(4). https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.1222

Rethlefsen, M. L., Farrell, A. M., Osterhaus Trzasko, L. C., & Brigham, T. J. (2015). Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(6), 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025

Schellinger, J., Sewell, K., Bloss, J. E., Ebron, T., & Forbes, C. (2021). The effect of librarian involvement on the quality of systematic reviews in dental medicine. PLOS ONE, 16(9), e0256833. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256833

Waffenschmidt, S., & Hausner, E. (2018). Collaborative working to improve searching. I J. Craven & P. Levay (Red.), Systematic Searching (s. 229–248). Facet. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781783303755.012

Whitney, R., Shih, M. C., Gordis, T., Nguyen, S. A., Meyer, T. A., & Brennan, E. A. (2024). Effect of librarian collaboration on otolaryngology systematic review and meta-analysis quality. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 112(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2024.1774

Downloads

Published

2026-04-21

How to Cite

Opheim, E., Johnsen, K. E., Jorem, G. T., Telle-Wernersen, D., & Urnes, K. D. (2026). Samarbeid med forskere om kunnskapsoppsummeringer: Muligheter og utfordringer. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education, 15(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.15845/noril.v15i1.4788

Issue

Section

Best Practice Articles